British Royal Family Tree

The British Royal Family has an impressive lineage and includes members of other Royal families from our neighbouring countries. Prince William recently broke the Royal tradition of marrying a ‘blue blood’ (a member of the upper class) in Britain or a member of a foreign royal family by marrying Kate Middleton, a middle class girl he met whilst at university in Scotland. Whilst this may be frowned upon by the most staunch royalists it has widely been regarded as a good union in bringing the usually inacessible royals closer the wider population of the Biritsh empire.

Here a quick guide to the current British Royal family tree:

Queen Elizabeth (April 21, 1926) married to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (June 10, 1921)

   
CHILDREN:
Prince Charles, Prince of Wales (November 14, 1948) married to and divorced from Diana Princess Of Wales (July 1, 1961 – August 31, 1997)           
                    
                    Children:
                    Prince William, Duke of Cambridge (June 21, 1982) married to Catherine Duchess of Cambridge (January 9, 1982)
                    Prince Harry (September 15, 1984)

(remarried to) Camilla Duchess of Cornwall (July 17, 1947)

Princess Anne ( August 15, 1950) married to and divorced from Mark Phillips (September 22, 1948)
          
          Children:
          Peter Phillips (15 November 1977) married to Autumn Kelly (May 3, 1978)
                    Children: 
                    Savannah (29 December 2010)
          Zara Phillips (May 15, 1981)

(remarried to) Timothy Lawrence (March 1, 1955)

Prince Andrew, Duke of York ( February 19, 1960) married to and divorced from Sarah Duchess of York  (October 15, 1959)

          Children:
          Princess Beatrice (August 8, 1988)
          Princess Eugenie (March 23, 1990)

Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex (March 10, 1964) married to Sophie Countess of Wessex (January 20, 1965)

          Children:
          Lady Louise (November 8, 2003)
          Viscount Severn (December 17, 2007)

WHAT IS THE HISTORY OF THE ROYAL FAMILY?

British Royal Family

British Royal Family

The British monarchy and royal family history has its origins in the Kings of the Angles, Saxons and Scots. It was Wessex that rapidly emerged under Alfred the Great as the dominant regional kingdom in England. His grandson Athelstan could be described as the first monarch to rule over a unitary state.

The royal family consists of those familial relatives closest to the reigning monarch. It has an intrinsic historical, political, social and cultural function. This significance stems from the hereditary principle, the fact that its members beginning with the first born male are in line to inherit the throne. There is created here a stability and certainty in government due to the existence of a pool of possible successors and a clear order succession.
 
The Norman conquest of 1066 increased the significance of the royal family since it hastened the process of centralisation. It also established clear graduations within English society, a hierarchical feudal system, made manifest in an Anglo-Saxon peasantry, a Norman aristocracy with the royal family and royal court at its pinnacle. The process of centralisation continued apace under the Tudors and then subsequently in tandem with that of democratization. 
 
Hence the importance of the royal family tree in constitutional and national terms. A preliminary examination of this genealogical representation soon focuses on the nature of the transfer of power from one branch of the family to another. For example, from Lancastrian to Yorkist or from Tudor to Stuart punctuated by civil conflict and strife as well as much political intrigue.      

The present royal family tree has its roots in the Hanoverian succession. We tend to think of the “inner circle” the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh and her immediate children. But in truth “the firm” is a much more complex and loosely defined phenomenon. It includes many minor royals such as the Duke and Duchess of Kent. In terms of royal family history its function remains unchanged but must be viewed in the context of a modern progressive constitutional monarchy.

All About The Slave Trade And The English Heritage

In the 1790s, the overwhelming impact brought about by the transatlantic slave trade was greatly felt across Britain, even beyond the slaving ports of London, Bristol and Liverpool. Undeniably, there were some people who lobbied for the slave abolition and others who benefited from the trade. It is, after all one of the largest forced migrations of human beings worldwide and had a major effect on the history of Europe, Americas and Africa. It was the enslavement and transportation, primarily of African people, to the colonies of the Western hemisphere that occurred in and around the Atlantic Ocean and had a great effect to the English heritage.

Most enslaved people were shipped to North and South America and were made to labour on the coffee, cocoa and cotton plantations. Others were made to work in gold and silver mines, in rice fields, the construction industry, timber and shipping. Some were put in houses to become servants.

The main concern during this time were economics and making more money. The wealth acquired during that time was invested back into British public buildings and country estates. Although some proponents of slave trade argue that the slave trade did not contribute much on the British economy stating that it only augmented 5% of the total economic status, it  is  still very evident that the slave trade paved way for Britain’s becoming a capitalist, thus making the English heritage a lineage of wealthy but unjust people.

A bill stating that it is against the law for any British person to capture and transport slaves was passed by the House of Commons in 1805 -  but the House of Lords blocked it. Lord Grenville persuaded the House of Lords though to accept the bill and made a speech where he noted that the trade was “contrary to the principles of justice, humanity and sound policy”. He said that the trade should have been abolished a long time ago. When the vote was taken the Abolition of the Slave Trade bill was passed in the House of Lords by 41 votes to 20. But there was not really a slave abolition until it was made illegal on 1833.

The English heritage was tainted with this era of slave trade and even after the slave abolition. The mindset of the people has become biased towards the black-skinned people. Originally, the slave trade was developed not from a racist, rather from an economic stance. However stereotypes of black subordination and white supremacy have become rampant leaving in the minds of the people that the white race is of the better race. Here, racism was developed.